Not all children have the benefit of preschool. Here’s what can be done about that

Leading up to the election, Labor campaigned on an ambitious suite of early childhood policies, including 15 hours of funded preschool for every Australian three-year-old and A$4 billion to increase childcare subsidies.

The Coalition said little about early childhood reform. It did put in place a reformed set of childcare subsidies that came into force in July 2018. These streamlined a previously complex funding system and benefited some (but not all) low-income families.

Yet Australia is still far from having an early childhood sector that delivers what children and families need. Here’s where the next government needs to look to ensure an effective, affordable early childhood sector for Australia.

Invest more in preschool, keep an eye on evidence

The evidence for the benefits of quality preschool is well established. So far, the Coalition has committed to another 12 months of funding for four-year-old preschool. But there is a strong case for long-term investment.

School readiness among Australian children has improved since the first national partnership agreement on four-year-old preschool funding in 2009. Ongoing funding would also improve efficiency in preschool provision by allowing providers to plan ahead.

Evidence also shows the earlier children can access quality early childhood services, the better their longer-term learning outcomes are likely to be.

But the jury is still out about what kind of model will best provide these opportunities to Australian children.

Australia has a complex early childhood sector. An estimated 57.8% (PDF) of Australian three-year-olds are already enrolled in preschool – although the Australian Bureau of Statistics advises caution in reporting preschool data. This is because “preschool” can mean many things, including stand-alone services, programs in childcare, or preschools located in schools.

Different models for three-year-old preschool are emerging across Australia. Victoria is providing subsidised preschool to three-year-olds in all settings (including long daycare); NSW is funding community preschools only; while the ACT is yet to release details. Other jurisdictions are targeting preschool to three-year-olds who require additional support.

The federal government would be smart to keep a close eye on the relative costs and benefits arising from different models as an evidence base to guide future investment.

Ensure every educator can help children learn

Preschools aren’t the only places Australian children can learn. Of all Australian children aged 0–5, around 43% receive (PDF) some kind of government-subsidised early childhood education and care.

But there is a widening gap in participation in early childhood services based on family income. Fewer than one-quarter (22.4%) (PDF) of young children from low-income families used preschool or childcare services in 2017, with a steady decline over the last five years.

While it may be too soon to see an impact from the Coalition’s childcare subsidy reforms, the government should aim for this figure to increase.

There’s also plenty to be done to keep improving quality (PDF) across the early childhood sector. Again, wide gaps exist across income groups. Early childhood service quality is lower in less wealthy communities (PDF, 2.62 MB), especially in the crucial area of educational quality.

The Australian E4Kids study – which followed around 2,500 children for five years –found only 7% of disadvantaged children received high-quality educational support (PDF, 520.44 KB) compared to 30% of the wealthiest children.

Expanding access to preschool is one way to improve the teaching quality younger children receive. In 2016, 92% of preschools (PDF) met or exceeded national standards in their educational program, compared to 74% of long daycare services.

One reason is that most preschool educators have degrees and higher qualifications are associated with higher-quality teaching (PDF). Effective three-year-old preschool requires skilled teachers who can design specific programs to meet the learning needs of younger children.

If the federal government’s appetite for preschool investment is limited, it could also look into developing the skills of the many educators who do not hold university degrees. They make up around 80% of the Australian early childhood workforce.

Australia urgently needs a national strategy to support all educators to develop the skills they need to provide children with high-quality learning experiences.

The national training package for vocational early childhood qualifications is being updated alongside the major review of the Australian Qualifications Framework, which provides the blueprint for Australia’s entire tertiary education sector.

This is the perfect time for governments to take a fresh look at the full suite of education and training options for professionals working with Australia’s youngest children.

Ensure investment meets its goals

Government investment in Australia’s early childhood sector has risen dramatically over the last decade. Quality reforms, such as higher ratios of adults to children, explain part of the increase.

The Coalition’s childcare subsidy package also represented a A$2.5 billion (PDF) increase in government investment.

Yet educators’ wages have remained unacceptably low (PDF) over this period. Staff turnover has also increased – the proportion of educators employed for three years or less (the period of time many children attend childcare) has climbed from 30.3% to 38.2% from 2010 to 2016.

This is not only inefficient, but undermines the stable, caring relationships that help children learn.

The government should look closely at how investment is flowing through the early childhood sector, especially appropriate models of support for for-profit providers. The profitability of early childhood services varies widely, but corporate providers recorded healthy profits during the last decade of government investment. However, this has recently eased due to oversupply.

Given profitability and quality don’t always mix, funding models must ensure every dollar delivers benefits for children and families.

Targeted programs can also help ensure investment reaches those most in need. The evidence base for Australian-based targeted early childhood programs is growing, building on international research.

One example is the Early Years Education Program (PDF), providing 145 vulnerable children with three years of tailored high-quality early childhood education and care. This program is already showing an impact on children’s IQ (PDF).

Early childhood advocates have long encouraged the two major parties to adopt policies that, evidence shows, will deliver the best opportunity for Australian children to thrive. The challenge is for the Coalition government to design a package of support for early learning that optimises investment and gets the best out of all the types of early childhood services children and families use.

Originally published in The Conversation.